Technical Center  ›  Comparison

Full Complement vs. Caged Cylindrical Roller Bearings: A Technical Comparison

The single biggest design fork in a cylindrical roller bearing is whether the rollers are held by a cage or packed to the maximum without one. Here is what that choice means in the field — and how to pick.

On this page 1. What is a full-complement (non-cage) bearing? 2. What is a caged bearing? 3. Side-by-side comparison 4. Capacity & speed at a glance 5. When to choose full complement (FAB) 6. When to choose caged 7. How to select (crusher checklist) 8. RAYSDE full-complement offering 9. FAQ

In a cylindrical roller bearing (CRB), the rollers carry radial load between two raceways. The number of rollers you can fit — and how they are kept in place — decides almost everything about the bearing's behaviour. Remove the cage and you fit the maximum number of rollers. That one change trades speed for load in a very predictable way.

1. What is a full-complement (non-cage) cylindrical roller bearing?

A full-complement CRB fills the space between the inner and outer race with the maximum possible count of rollers, with no cage (separator) between them. Because every millimetre of space holds a roller:

2. What is a caged cylindrical roller bearing?

A caged CRB uses a separator to space and guide each roller. There are fewer rollers than a full-complement design of the same size, but each roller runs in a positively located pocket:

3. Side-by-side comparison

CriterionFull Complement (no cage)Caged (separator)
Radial load capacity (same size)HighestLower (fewer rollers)
Axial load capabilityNone (radial only)*None, except NJ/NUP limited axial*
Allowable speedLow (~30–50% of caged)High
RigidityVery highHigh
Radial section / envelopeSmaller (space saving)Larger
Heat at speedHigher (rollers rub)Lower
Roller guidanceBy each other (collision)By cage (positive)
Typical dutyLow-speed, heavy, shock loadHigh-speed, smooth

*Cylindrical roller bearings are fundamentally radial bearings. For combined radial + axial loads, use an NJ/NUP design (limited axial) or a different type (tapered / spherical / angular-contact).

4. Capacity & speed at a glance

Approximate, normalised to the caged design of the same size. Exact figures depend on series, lubrication and clearance.

Radial load capacity (higher = better)

Full complement
100%
Caged
~70%

Allowable speed (higher = better)

Caged
100%
Full complement
~40%
Rule of thumb: if a machine runs below roughly 40–50% of the caged bearing's limiting speed, a full-complement design usually gives you more radial capacity and rigidity for free — at the cost of top-end speed it wasn't going to use anyway.

5. When to choose full complement (FAB model)

FeatureNo cage — maximum roller count in the envelope.
AdvantageUp to ~30% more radial capacity & rigidity than a caged equivalent of the same size.
BenefitLonger service life and fewer premature failures in low-speed, shock-load machines → less downtime, lower maintenance cost.

Where it belongs: crushers, ball mills, rolling stands, hoists, conveyors, winches, heavy/slow gearboxes, slewing and port machinery, and some wind-turbine main shafts. Anything slow, heavy and shock-loaded is full-complement territory.

6. When to choose caged

For applications dominated by speed and smoothness — electric motors, pumps, machine-tool spindles, high-speed gearboxes, and anywhere friction heat would otherwise limit life. Here the cage pays for itself many times over.

7. How to select a full-complement bearing (crusher checklist)

  1. Load: determine radial load — both dynamic (running) and static — and apply a shock factor for crusher / impact duty (often 1.5–2.5×).
  2. Speed: compute actual rpm. If it is below ~40–50% of the caged bearing's limiting speed, full complement is viable.
  3. Envelope: measure shaft diameter (bore) and the radial space available. Full complement's smaller section is an advantage in tight housings.
  4. Locating vs non-locating: pick the series — N / NU (non-locating, free axial), NJ / NUP (limited axial location), or full-complement NCF / NJG.
  5. Precision & clearance: specify P0/P6 and the right internal clearance for your temperature and fit.
  6. Lubrication: at low speed, full complement needs ample grease (or oil bath); ensure the housing supports it.
RAYSDE scope: we supply N, NJ, NU, NUP, NCF, NJG, SL and RSL series — single and double row — bore from 20 mm (standard) up to 500 mm, larger on request. Custom non-standard designs are our differentiator; tell us the load, speed and envelope and we size it.

8. RAYSDE full-complement offering

Full-complement cylindrical roller bearings are our most-asked, most-specialised line — the one we are happy to engineer around your drawing rather than pull from a catalogue. Standard sizes: MOQ 300 sets, lead time 15–20 days; non-standard: MOQ 50 sets, 30–45 days. Full specs on the full-complement landing page →

9. FAQ

Can a full-complement bearing take axial load?

No — cylindrical rollers are radial-only. For light axial location use NJ/NUP; for real combined loads choose tapered, spherical or angular-contact bearings instead.

Why is the speed limit so much lower?

Without a cage, neighbouring rollers contact and slide as they pass the load zone, creating friction and heat. A cage keeps them apart so they roll cleanly.

Is full complement simply "stronger"?

Stronger in radial load and rigidity, yes. But not faster — and it will not outlive a caged bearing in a high-speed application. Match the design to the duty.

Do you make double-row full complement?

Yes — single and double row, including SL/RSL type, for very high radial stiffness in compact spaces.

Download the full technical whitepaper (PDF)

The printable version adds the dimension tables, load-curve plots and a one-page selection worksheet. We'll email it to you.

Email me the PDF

Specify the right bearing with us

Send load, speed and envelope — get a sized proposal from 20+ years of application history.